The Anselm Ontological Argument Philosophy Essay.
The ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. “Ontological” literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. The main component of the Ontological argument can be found in the Anselm’s “Proslogion” which is a short work that tries to demonstrate both the existence and the nature.
Assess the Ontological Argument Essay. The ontological argument was first formulated by St. Anselm in the 11th century. It argues the existence of God from a deductive and a priori stance. God is a being than which none greater can be conceived. This is the response given by St Anselm to the fool in the psalm who believed there was no God.
As is readily evident, each version of the ontological argument rests on the assumption that the concept of God, as it is described in the argument, is self-consistent. Both versions of Anselm’s argument rely on the claim that the idea of God (that is, a being than which none greater can be conceived) “exists as an idea in the understanding.
A look at theologist Anselm’s ontological argument for God’s existence which has been debated for almost a thousand years. Anselm’s Ontological Argument Saint Anselm of Aosta, Bec, and Canterbury, perhaps during a moment of enlightenment or starvation-induced hallucination, succeeded in formulating an argument for God’s existence which has been debated for almost a thousand years.
I just revised moral argument for existence to God and read through an essay I wrote on ontological argument today, so my knowledge aint that great, but I'd personally elaborate on the two forms of the argument a bit more, as the question relates to explaining the argument, and it seems you've only written several sentences for both forms of Anselm's.
Starting from the dictate of faith or a general universal belief, he is able to construct his proof of God’s existence. Following the logic in his argument, this essay will establish that the ontological proof is a valid argument.
In the piece of Ontological Argument, St. Anselm argues that being able to exist in both reality and in understanding is the best to humans. He specifically focuses on the topic of an omnient God. He does use a reducto in his argument, so part of the premises contradict, but this contradiction strengthens the proof for the conclusion.